Evaluating Web Content Using the W3C Credibility Signals

نویسندگان

چکیده

The credibility and trustworthiness of online content has become a major societal issue as human communication information exchange continues to evolve digitally. prevalence misinformation, circulated by fraudsters, trolls, political activists state-sponsored actors, motivated heightened interest in automated evaluation curation tools. We present an system aid users assessments web pages, focusing on the analysis 23 mostly language- content-related signals content. find that emotional characteristics, various morphological syntactical properties language, exclamation mark all caps usage are particularly indicative credibility. Less credible pages have more emotional, shorter less complex texts, put greater emphasis headline, which is longer, contains frequently clickbait. Our achieves 63% accuracy fake news classification, 28% predicting rating five-point Likert scale.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Towards the Improvement of W3c Web Content Accessibility Guidelines

This paper presents the results of a study about possible improvements to the ISO 40500 standard, which contains the web content accessibility guidelines established by the World Wide Web Consortium in WCAG 2.0. Expert web developers from twelve different countries have participated in the study. In order to ensure the objectivity of the results, the experts interviewed were unrelated to each o...

متن کامل

Studying Web Content Credibility by Social Simulation

The Internet has become an important source of information that significantly affects social, economical and political life. The content available in the Web is the basis for the operation of the digital economy. Moreover, Web content has become essential for many Web users that have to make decisions. Meanwhile, more and more often we encounter Web content of low credibility due to incorrect o...

متن کامل

How Content Contributors Assess and Establish Credibility on the Web

The proliferation of user-generated content (UGC) is one of the distinguishing characteristics of Web 2.0. Internet users contribute content online through platforms such as blogs, wikis, video sharing sites, and sites that allow user feedback. Yet little is known of the credibility practices of these content contributors. Through phone interviews conducted with 29 online content contributors, ...

متن کامل

Evaluating Rater Credibility for Reputation Assessment of Web Services

This paper investigates the problem of establishing trust in service-oriented environments. We focus on providing an infrastructure for evaluating the credibility of raters in a reputation-based framework that would enable trust-based Web services interactions. The techniques we develop would aid a service consumer in assigning an appropriate weight to the testimonies of different raters regard...

متن کامل

Data on the Web: A W3C Perspective

What is the “high level view” of data on the Web that can be traced down within W3C’s rich roadmap of technologies? What the relationships between the “big needs” of data on the Web, and the forthcoming Web standards? A perspective is provided, in a nutshell.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Studies on the semantic web

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1868-1158']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/ssw220005